Skip to main content

The lie about the Bible

 

There is a lie that has been told for over 2000 years. A lie that is so deeply rooted in how we think that most Christians will never accept the truth. The lie is that the Bible is the inerrant, infallible Word of God.

It means that people believe every single verse in the Bible is the word (or the words) of God. That every verse can be quoted as 'This is what God says'. 

I can list a lot of Bible verses that is a real problem if you believe that - some of those are shocking and others just embarrassing to try and justify as something God would have said. But that is not the reason you should change how you see the Bible. 

How we see the Bible makes all the difference

The Bible 'contains' the Word of God - if you study it and God's 'Word' is revealed to you through the Holy Spirit. But not every verse in the Bible is the Word of God (I will give you proof of this in the next article).

The Word of God is not limited to the Bible. We will be looking at other Gospels and books that were written at the same time (more or less) but were not included in the Bible. There are also many different ways God 'speaks' to us.

The Bible is inspired by God, but written by people. People that made mistakes. Some mistakes in the Bible are silly and irrelevant, others are important to be aware of. 

At first it will be very difficult to let go of the idea that every single verse in the Bible is the Word of God. In the beginning it can be very confusing and unsettling - you might go through a phase where you are not sure what to believe any more. But if you continue to look for the truth, if you change how you see the Bible, you will start to discover who Jesus really was and what He really taught.  
Jesus said, "Those who seek should not stop seeking until they find. When they find, they will be disturbed. When they are disturbed, they will marvel, and will reign over all. - Gospel of Thomas, Saying 2
Having a written 'Word of God' is, ... well; not from God!

In the Old Testament it was prophesised  what we will have in the new covenant. Not a written document with the laws of God, but the laws of God written in our hearts (Jeremiah 31:31-34). This promise was repeated in the New Testament. 

This is the covenant I will establish with the people of Israel after that time, declares the Lord. I will put my laws in their minds and write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. No longer will they teach their neighbor, or say to one another, ‘Know the Lord,’ because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest. For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more.” - 

Hebrew 8:10-12

Jesus also made clear what will follow once He was gone. He did not say we will have a neat and complete written 'Word of God' - but that we will need to Holy Spirit to remind us of His teachings.

But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you. - John 14:26 

The Bible says Jesus (and His teachings) are the Word of God (John 1). 

The Bible as a whole is never referred to as the Word of God - because the books in the Bible were only chosen 2 to 3 centuries after Jesus gave us the Good News. Mostly when the Bible is referring to the 'Word of God', the writer was referring to the teachings of Jesus. I will be writing a separate article where we will be looking at each of the verses people use to defend the idea that the Bible is the inerrant, infallible Word of God.

Where does the idea that the Bible is the written Word of God come from?

The clue to where the lie comes from is in the prophesy that we will not have written laws.

No longer will they teach their neighbor, or say to one another, ‘Know the Lord,’ because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest. - Hebrew 8:11

Now that is a problem! How Christians like to tell other people what to do. How will they be able to tell others how wrong they are if they don't have God's words written down on paper? 

Religion gives you the power to control people. Constantine knew this. He saw that this movement that Jesus started had great potential, but there was a problem. It was a spiritual movement - not a religion. 

There was no official leadership or doctrine with many different factions. How do you control people with that? So he started a process where the Christian religion was started and the books in the Bible that we have today were chosen and declared as 'God's Word'.

Constantine chose Christianity as the official religion of Rome. Pagan priests had to convert to Christianity in order to keep their positions. They converted to Christianity for the wrong reasons and were appointed in powerful positions in this new church. These people were part of the process that later decided what books should be included in the bible. 

They (the early Church) needed to create the Bible as the 'Word of God' because they needed written doctrine in order to have a religion that can be used to control the masses. They not only left out books that was against organized religion, they destroyed all the copies of those books they could find. 

Not only did they decide what books should be in the Bible, they added the lie that every single verse in those books is the 'Word of God'. They also added letters that were not seen as 'God's Word' by the authors or the people at the time, as 'God's Word'.

A religion needs rules - a list of things you should and shouldn't do. If your doctrine is based on scripture where each person is encouraged to look for the truth within those scriptures, not blindly just following every piece of scripture - then they (the religious) have a problem. 

Without written scripture that is seen as the 'law of God' you can't have a religion that brings in trillions of dollars. People will decide if they should give money to the church or simply help those in need directly. They will decide if they need to listen to what the pastor says or even if it is necessary to go to a church meeting every Sunday. 

No, that will not work (for them) - that will really be bad for business. The 'Church' needs a written law so that they can tell people what they need to do. Even if those very scriptures clearly state we should not have written laws. 

It is (most) people that need and want us to have a written and complete Word of God - not God!

Not yet convinced? Of course not - but we are only getting started. 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Problem with the Gospel of Matthew

  The Gospel of Matthew has a lot of information about Jesus that is not in any other of the gospels - but there is a problem you need to be aware of. There are a couple of serious mistakes in the Gospel of Matthew that follows a specific pattern.  The Old Testament did prophecy about Jesus, but in an attempt to make Jesus more likeable or believable to Jewish Christians, the Gospel of Matthew goes to far when linking Jesus to Old Testament. There are also things that Jesus said in the Gospel of Matthew, that are not in any of the other gospels, and that clearly could not have been something that Jesus have said. We will see a clear pattern of when something was added to what was likely the original message of Jesus.   The Gospel of Matthew was not written by the apostle Matthew. The author is unknown but it is very unlikely that the author was an apostle. An eyewitness to the ministry of Jesus would not have relied so heavily on the Gospel of Mark as a source. It was written between A

The problem with Luke-Acts

  We are on a journey where we discover the truth about the Bible. In this article we will be looking at Luke and Acts. Two very important books - but also two books that are not perfect. Both books clearly shows the same pattern of mistakes that were made by the author. Mistakes that you need to be aware of in order to discover the true teachings of Jesus.  The author of Luke-Acts was either a companion of Paul or someone that followed his teachings closely. Paul came from a strong religious background and that had an influence on his teachings. As we have seen in the article ' Paul's words are not God's words ' - Paul was not taught by Jesus and had very little contact with the apostles. There were some fundamental flaws in the teachings of Paul and the author of Luke-Acts took some of these flaws to the next level. Before you continue with this article, if you haven't already, you must first read the following articles for some background: The Lie about the Bible