Skip to main content

The Gospel of Thomas

 

The Gospel of Thomas is mostly rejected by mainstream Christianity. The reason is simple - the teachings in the Gospel of Thomas goes against a lot of what the 'Christian Church' is teaching us. 

It was discovered near Nag Hammadi, Egypt, in December 1945 among a group of books known as the Nag Hammadi library. The reason it was only discovered in 1945 is that the early church destroyed all copies of the gospel.

When was the Gospel of Thomas written?

Scholars have proposed dates of composition as early as AD 60 and as late as AD 250. Most scholars however agree that it is between AD 60 to AD 140. Even a later date is not that late seeing that the Gospel of John was only written around AD 90 – 100.

The date is important. An early date would be a big problem for mainstream Christianity because it would mean that the gospels in the New Testament dependent on the Gospel of Thomas, making the Gospel of Thomas more reliable. 

The argument for a late date for Thomas

The main argument for a late date is that it is gnostic in nature. It is not, although it might have appealed to Gnostics. The idea of 'secret teachings' (a gnostic theme) is not an idea that is foreign to Jesus and comes through very strongly in the Bible – especially in Mark.  (Mark 4:11-12, Mark 4:34)

Gnostics believe the body is evil and one should only focus on the spirit. The opposite is taught by Jesus in Thomas (we will get to that in upcoming articles). 

Another argument for a late date is that the Gospel of Thomas must have relied on the New Testament. The opposite however can just as easily be argued. Sayings in Thomas doesn't contradict each other and makes more sense that their counterparts in the New Testament, for example:

  • Where two or three are gathered in My name - see God is not in the crowd
  • Blessed are the poor - article coming soon.

The actual reason why a late date is more popular is not because there are proof of this, but that it would just be to disturbing for most Christians to even consider that Thomas is a reliable gospel that contains the actual sayings of Jesus.

Thomas does not go against what is said in the other gospels in the New Testament, but it does go against a lot of what Paul taught and what the early church did. 

Early date for Thomas

Evidence pointing to an early date:

  • Shorter versions of a saying are earlier than more elaborate traditions. In the case of the Gospel of Thomas, certain sayings of Jesus are more simple and shorter than the Synoptic parallels.
  • The genre of a "sayings collection" is indicative of the 1st century, and that in particular the "use of parables without allegorical amplification" seems to antedate the canonical gospels.
  • Sayings in Thomas from that of their parallels in the synoptic gospels shows that Thomas was not evidently reliant upon the canonical gospels and probably pre-dated them.
  • Thomas focuses on what Jesus said. The gospels in the Bible often refer to 'as it is written' -referring to Old Testament scripture. Referencing scripture seems to have become more important in later years (compare Mark to Matthew). 
  • Another argument for an early date is what some scholars have suggested is an interplay between the Gospel of John and the logia of Thomas. Parallels between the two have been taken to suggest that Thomas' logia preceded John's work.
  • In 1 Corinthians 2:9, Paul (who's letters pre-dates even Mark) says 'as it is written. Isa 64:4 and Isa 65:17 is then referenced. But the scripture in Isaiah is different to the way Paul is using it but very similar (identical almost) to GOT 17.
  • Paul's idea that there should neither be man or woman (Galatians 3:28) is nowhere in the Old Testament scripture but the idea comes very strongly through in the GOT. 
  • In GOT Jesus says to the disciples to go to James after he has been taken away. James was the leader of the early church and died in 62 or 69 AD. Why would this instruction be recorded after James has died? James as a prominent 'elder' in the church before 70AD is confirmed by Galatians 2 that pre-dates the gospels. The GOT is in opposition to Jewish traditions – something that was shared by James (unlike popular belief – James and Peter agreed with Paul and stood against the Jewish Christians).

The words of Jesus

At first glance, the Gospel of Thomas will be strange and a lot of sayings might not sound like something Jesus might have said. In this blog I will be writing several articles about those strange sayings and you will discover that the sayings aren't strange at all but is in line with everything else Jesus taught and how He lived.

Even if you choose not to read the Gospel of Thomas - if you just focus on what Jesus taught in the Bible, you will start to see a very different Jesus to the one being portrayed by mainstream Christianity. 
  

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The lie about the Bible

  There is a lie that has been told for over 2000 years. A lie that is so deeply rooted in how we think that most Christians will never accept the truth. The lie is that the Bible is the inerrant, infallible Word of God. It means that people believe every single verse in the Bible is the word (or the words) of God. That every verse can be quoted as 'This is what God says'.  I can list a lot of Bible verses that is a real problem if you believe that - some of those are shocking and others just embarrassing to try and justify as something God would have said. But that is not the reason you should change how you see the Bible.  How we see the Bible makes all the difference The Bible 'contains' the Word of God - if you study it and God's 'Word' is revealed to you through the Holy Spirit. But not every verse in the Bible is the Word of God (I will give you proof of this in the next article). The Word of God is not limited to the Bible. We will be looking at other
Post a Comment
Read more

The Problem with the Gospel of Matthew

  The Gospel of Matthew has a lot of information about Jesus that is not in any other of the gospels - but there is a problem you need to be aware of. There are a couple of serious mistakes in the Gospel of Matthew that follows a specific pattern.  The Old Testament did prophecy about Jesus, but in an attempt to make Jesus more likeable or believable to Jewish Christians, the Gospel of Matthew goes to far when linking Jesus to Old Testament. There are also things that Jesus said in the Gospel of Matthew, that are not in any of the other gospels, and that clearly could not have been something that Jesus have said. We will see a clear pattern of when something was added to what was likely the original message of Jesus.   The Gospel of Matthew was not written by the apostle Matthew. The author is unknown but it is very unlikely that the author was an apostle. An eyewitness to the ministry of Jesus would not have relied so heavily on the Gospel of Mark as a source. It was written between A
Post a Comment
Read more

The problem with Luke-Acts

  We are on a journey where we discover the truth about the Bible. In this article we will be looking at Luke and Acts. Two very important books - but also two books that are not perfect. Both books clearly shows the same pattern of mistakes that were made by the author. Mistakes that you need to be aware of in order to discover the true teachings of Jesus.  The author of Luke-Acts was either a companion of Paul or someone that followed his teachings closely. Paul came from a strong religious background and that had an influence on his teachings. As we have seen in the article ' Paul's words are not God's words ' - Paul was not taught by Jesus and had very little contact with the apostles. There were some fundamental flaws in the teachings of Paul and the author of Luke-Acts took some of these flaws to the next level. Before you continue with this article, if you haven't already, you must first read the following articles for some background: The Lie about the Bible
Post a Comment
Read more