The Gospel of Thomas

 

The Gospel of Thomas is mostly rejected by mainstream Christianity. The reason is simple - the teachings in the Gospel of Thomas goes against a lot of what the 'Christian Church' is teaching us. 

It was discovered near Nag Hammadi, Egypt, in December 1945 among a group of books known as the Nag Hammadi library. The reason it was only discovered in 1945 is that the early church destroyed all copies of the gospel.

When was the Gospel of Thomas written?

Scholars have proposed dates of composition as early as AD 60 and as late as AD 250. Most scholars however agree that it is between AD 60 to AD 140. Even a later date is not that late seeing that the Gospel of John was only written around AD 90 – 100.

The date is important. An early date would be a big problem for mainstream Christianity because it would mean that the gospels in the New Testament dependent on the Gospel of Thomas, making the Gospel of Thomas more reliable. 

The argument for a late date for Thomas

The main argument for a late date is that it is gnostic in nature. It is not, although it might have appealed to Gnostics. The idea of 'secret teachings' (a gnostic theme) is not an idea that is foreign to Jesus and comes through very strongly in the Bible – especially in Mark.  (Mark 4:11-12, Mark 4:34)

Gnostics believe the body is evil and one should only focus on the spirit. The opposite is taught by Jesus in Thomas (we will get to that in upcoming articles). 

Another argument for a late date is that the Gospel of Thomas must have relied on the New Testament. The opposite however can just as easily be argued. Sayings in Thomas doesn't contradict each other and makes more sense that their counterparts in the New Testament, for example:

  • Where two or three are gathered in My name - see God is not in the crowd
  • Blessed are the poor - article coming soon.

The actual reason why a late date is more popular is not because there are proof of this, but that it would just be to disturbing for most Christians to even consider that Thomas is a reliable gospel that contains the actual sayings of Jesus.

Thomas does not go against what is said in the other gospels in the New Testament, but it does go against a lot of what Paul taught and what the early church did. 

Early date for Thomas

Evidence pointing to an early date:

  • Shorter versions of a saying are earlier than more elaborate traditions. In the case of the Gospel of Thomas, certain sayings of Jesus are more simple and shorter than the Synoptic parallels.
  • The genre of a "sayings collection" is indicative of the 1st century, and that in particular the "use of parables without allegorical amplification" seems to antedate the canonical gospels.
  • Sayings in Thomas from that of their parallels in the synoptic gospels shows that Thomas was not evidently reliant upon the canonical gospels and probably pre-dated them.
  • Thomas focuses on what Jesus said. The gospels in the Bible often refer to 'as it is written' -referring to Old Testament scripture. Referencing scripture seems to have become more important in later years (compare Mark to Matthew). 
  • Another argument for an early date is what some scholars have suggested is an interplay between the Gospel of John and the logia of Thomas. Parallels between the two have been taken to suggest that Thomas' logia preceded John's work.
  • In 1 Corinthians 2:9, Paul (who's letters pre-dates even Mark) says 'as it is written. Isa 64:4 and Isa 65:17 is then referenced. But the scripture in Isaiah is different to the way Paul is using it but very similar (identical almost) to GOT 17.
  • Paul's idea that there should neither be man or woman (Galatians 3:28) is nowhere in the Old Testament scripture but the idea comes very strongly through in the GOT. 
  • In GOT Jesus says to the disciples to go to James after he has been taken away. James was the leader of the early church and died in 62 or 69 AD. Why would this instruction be recorded after James has died? James as a prominent 'elder' in the church before 70AD is confirmed by Galatians 2 that pre-dates the gospels. The GOT is in opposition to Jewish traditions – something that was shared by James (unlike popular belief – James and Peter agreed with Paul and stood against the Jewish Christians).

The words of Jesus

At first glance, the Gospel of Thomas will be strange and a lot of sayings might not sound like something Jesus might have said. In this blog I will be writing several articles about those strange sayings and you will discover that the sayings aren't strange at all but is in line with everything else Jesus taught and how He lived.

Even if you choose not to read the Gospel of Thomas - if you just focus on what Jesus taught in the Bible, you will start to see a very different Jesus to the one being portrayed by mainstream Christianity. 
  

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The lie about the Bible

Image
  There is a lie that has been told for over 2000 years. A lie that is so deeply rooted in how we think that most Christians will never accept the truth. The lie is that the Bible is the inerrant, infallible Word of God. It means that people believe every single verse in the Bible is the word (or the words) of God. That every verse can be quoted as 'This is what God says'.  I can list a lot of Bible verses that is a real problem if you believe that - some of those are shocking and others just embarrassing to try and justify as something God would have said. But that is not the reason you should change how you see the Bible.  How we see the Bible makes all the difference The Bible 'contains' the Word of God - if you study it and God's 'Word' is revealed to you through the Holy Spirit. But not every verse in the Bible is the Word of God (I will give you proof of this in the next article). The Word of God is not limited to the Bible. We will be looking at other
Read more

The Problem with the Gospel of Matthew

Image
  The Gospel of Matthew has a lot of information about Jesus that is not in any other of the gospels - but there is a problem you need to be aware of. There are a couple of serious mistakes in the Gospel of Matthew that follows a specific pattern.  The Old Testament did prophecy about Jesus, but in an attempt to make Jesus more likeable or believable to Jewish Christians, the Gospel of Matthew goes to far when linking Jesus to Old Testament. There are also things that Jesus said in the Gospel of Matthew, that are not in any of the other gospels, and that clearly could not have been something that Jesus have said. We will see a clear pattern of when something was added to what was likely the original message of Jesus.   The Gospel of Matthew was not written by the apostle Matthew. The author is unknown but it is very unlikely that the author was an apostle. An eyewitness to the ministry of Jesus would not have relied so heavily on the Gospel of Mark as a source. It was written between A
Read more

Paul's words are not God's words

Image
  Paul has written most of the New Testament. What he has written is very important and we can learn a lot from it. But what Paul has written is not the Word of God.  What Jesus taught and what Paul has said (or written) is not on the same level - not even close. Jesus and His teachings are the Word of God. The teachings of Jesus and Paul are fundamentally different and Paul sometimes contradicts Jesus.  In my previous articles we looked at the lie about the Bible and that not every verse in the Bible are the word of God . We will now be looking at Paul and the books/letters that he wrote in the New Testament.  Paul was not taught by Jesus Paul never met Jesus in person. But wait - didn't Jesus reveal Himself to Paul? Yes, but He also revealed Himself to me and to most other children of God. Most of us can tell a story of how Jesus revealed Himself to us as our saviour - the day we decided to become born again children of God. Maybe your experience was so deep and powerful, it wa
Read more